Proposing Blue Sukuk in Indonesia: An Interpretive Structural Model
How to cite (SHIRKAH) :
This research aims to identify the priority factors that being barriers to issue and develop Islamic blue sukuk in Indonesia. Employing the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) method, it also offers several solutions for the identified problems. As an advanced planning methodology, ISM is used to identify, analyze, and summarize various relationships among factors that define a problem, model, or issue. In the ISM framework, there are three criteria of blue sukuk development in Indonesia including (1) aspect or foundation required within the framework of developing blue sukuk; (2) infrastructure that will be used as a basis for sukuk issuance (underlying projects); and (3) stakeholders involved in the development of blue sukuk in Indonesia. Results show that important foundations needed in the development of blue sukuk are regulatory aspects, feasible underlying projects, investors, and inter-institutional coordination, respectively. Finally, possible underlying infrastructures for the issuance of Blue Sukuk are the development of integrated fishing villages as well as the procurement of large and environmentally friendly fishing boats.
Altaleb, G.S., & Alkhatib, A.Y. (2016). Sovereign Islamic sukuk and the economic development: A case study of Jordan. European Journal of Business and Management, 8(32), 115-118.
Abdullah, N., & Nayan, M.A. (2020). Green Sukuk: Financing the Future to Sustainable Environment. International Journal of Zakat and Islamic Philanthropy, 2(2), 14-23.
Anggraini, Y. (2018). Peran green sukuk dalam memperkokoh posisi Indonesia di pasar keuangan syariah global. El-Barka: Journal of Islamic Economics and Business, 1(2), 251–268.
Arshad, H., Muda, R., & Osman, I. (2018). Impact of exchange rate and oil price on the yield of sovereign bond and sukuk: Evidence from Malaysian capital market. Journal of Emerging Economies & Islamic Research, 5(4), 27-41.
Ascarya, W. G., Widodo C., Enny A., & Ferry S. (2012). Strategi Meningkatkan Preferensi Perbankan Syariah Indonesia Dalam Menggunakan Pembiayaan Bagi- Hasil. Jakarta: Central Banking Education and Studies Department, Bank Indonesia.
Bolaños, R., Fontela, E., Nenclares, A., & Pastor, P. (2005). Using interpretive structural modelling in strategic decisionâ€making groups. Management Decision, 43(6), 877-895.
Devi, A. & Rusydiana, A. S. (2016). Islamic Group Lending Model (GLM) and Financial Inclusion. International Journal of Islamic Business Ethics, 1(1), 80-94.
Faisal, M.N., & Al-Esmael, B.A. (2014). Modeling the enablers of organizational commitment. Business Process Management Journal, 20(1), 25-46.
Faisal, M.N. (2015). A study of inhibitors to transparency in red meat supply chains in Gulf cooperation council (GCC) countries. Business Process Management Journal, 21(6), 1299-1318.
Godet, M. (1986). Introduction to ‘la prospective’: seven key ideas and one scenario method. Futures, 18(2), 134-157.
Gorvett, R., & Liu, N. (2007). Using interpretive structural modeling to identify and quantify interactive risks. Orlando –USA: ASTIN Colloquium.
Handayani, D., & Surachman, E.N. (2017). Sukuk negara as financing strategy for renewable energy infrastructure: Case study of Muara Laboh geothermal power project. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(4), 115-125.
Hariyanto, E. (2019). Blue Sukuk in Indonesia. Results of personal indepth-interviews, August 10th, 2019, Tazkia University.
Ilma, A. F. N. (2017). Blue Economy: Kesimbangan Perspektif Ekonomi dan Lingkungan. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 14(1).
Ismatullah, R. (2011). Paradigma ekonomi kelautan dalam perspektif ekonomi Islam: Reinterpretasi Ayat-ayat Kelautan yang Berdimensi Ekonomi. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Indonesia, 1(2), 95-110.
Jabeen, F. & Faisal, M.N. (2018). Imperatives for improving entrepreneurial behavior among females in the UAE: An empirical study and structural model. Gender in Management, 33(3), 234-252. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-03-2016-0042
Jabeen, F., Faisal, M.N., & Katsioloudes, M.I. (2017). Entrepreneurial mindset and the role of universities as strategic drivers of entrepreneurship evidence from the UAE. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(1), 136-157.
Jarkasih, M., & Rusydiana, A.S. (2010). Mengurai masalah pengembangan sukuk korporasi Indonesia dengan pendekatan ANP. Proceedings at International Academic Conference, Shariah Economic Days 2010 FEUI, 3 February 2010.
Jarkasih, M., & Rusydiana, A.S. (2009). Perkembangan pasar sukuk: Perbandingan Indonesia, Malaysia dan dunia. Antisipasi: Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi, 1(2).
Kadir, H., Rizal, A., & Laapo, A. (2016). Analisis Tingkat Keberlanjutan Program Kapal Inka Mina (30 gt) di Desa Labuan Bajo Kabupaten Donggala. Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi Tadulako, 5(3), 54–64.
Kanungo S & V.V. Batnagar, (2002). Beyond Generic Models for Information System Quality: The Use of Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM). Journal of System Research and Behavior Science. 19(2), 531-549.
Kazemi, M. (2015). Compiling the strategy plan using a hybrid of BSC-ISM. Management Science Letters, 5(2015), 11-20.
Khairunisa, R., Akbar, N., & Devi, A. (2017). Exploring strategies to enhance Islamic banking’s role to raise cash waqf funds. Iqtishadia: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, 10(2), 1-28.
Lee, D. M. (2007). Structured Decision Making with Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM). Canada: Sorach Inc.
Li, M., and Yang, J. (2014). Analysis of interrelationships between critical waste factors in office building retrofit projects using interpretive structural modeling. International Journal of Construction Management, 14(1), 15-27.
Marimin. (2004). Pengambilan Keputusan Kreteria Majemuk. Teknik dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Mazdeh, M.M., Shafia, M.A., Bandarian, R., & Kahrizi, A. (2015). An ISM approach for analyzing the factors in technology transfer. Decision Science Letters, 4(2015), 335-348.
Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries. (2019). Permen KP Nomor 63 Tahun 2017 tentang : Rencana Strategis Kementerian kelautan Tahun 2015 - 2019.
Mitsaliyandito, R.Q., & Arundina, T. (2018). Dynamic relationship between sovereign bond and sukuk market developments in Indonesia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 26(5), 27-38.
Moody’s Investors Service. (2019). Moody’s Annual Report. New York.
Morea, D., & Poggi, L.A. (2017). An innovative model for the sustainability of investments in the wind energy sector: The use of green sukuk in an Italian case study. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(2), 53-60.
Nienhaus, V., & Karatas, A. (2016). Market perceptions of liquid sovereign sukuk: A new asset class? International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 9(1), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-03-2015-0027
Rahman, M.P., Duasa, J., Kassim, S., & Zainudin, W.R.A. (2017). Sovereign sukuk pricing analysis: Do macroeconomic variables matter? International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 25(3), 513-528.
Rani, F., & Cahayasari, W. (2015). Model Blue Economy di Kawasan Asia Pasifik (Studi Kasus: Penerapan Model Blue Economy pada Industri Perikanan Indonesia). Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Riau, 2(1).
Ravi, V. (2015). Analysis of interactions among barriers of eco-efficiency in electronics packaging industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(1), 16-25.
Rusydiana, A.S., & Devi, A. (2018). Mengembangkan koperasi syariah di Indonesia: Pendekatan interpretive structural model (ISM). Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 9(1), 1-23.
Rusydiana, A.S. (2018a). Developing Islamic financial technology in Indonesia. Hasanuddin Economics and Business Review, 2(2), 143-152.
Rusydiana, A.S. (2018b). Analysis of cash waqf development in Indonesia using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 4(1), 1-24.
Saaty, T. L. (2004). Decision making—the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of systems science and systems engineering, 13(1), 1-35.
Sage, A. (1977). Interpretive Structural Modeling: Methodology for Large-Scale Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Sharma, V., Grover, S., & Sharma, S.K. (2017). Analyzing the barriers affecting the effective utilization of quality tools and techniques using integrated ISM approach. Management Science Letters, 7(2017), 525-540.
Thakkar, J., Deshmukh, S. G., Gupta, A. D., & Shankar, R. (2007). Development of a balanced scorecard: an integrated approach of interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and analytic network process (ANP). International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(1), 25-59.
Venkatesh, V.G., Rathi, S., & Patwa, S. (2015). Analysis on supply chain risks in Indian apparel retail chains and proposal of risk prioritization model using interpretive structural modeling. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 26, 153-167.
Warfield, J. N. (1974). Developing interconnected matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics, 4(1), 81-87.
Copyright
Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethical disputes, and fraud very seriously. Automotive Experiences is published under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (online and print) with the work simultaneously. We use the restrictive license (non-commercial) as follows:
BY (attribution): Users are allowed to share, distribute and redistribute the published article in any medium or format, with an identification of the authors and its initial publication in this journal. Authors are encouraged to post and distribute their articles immediately after publication (e.g., institutional or public repositories, personal websites). Authors are allowed to enter into additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published and an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
NC (non-commercial): Users are not allowed to use the article commercially without the permission of the authors. Authors agree explicitly that the published article is indexed worldwide in databases, repositories and indexation services, even if these services operate on a commercial basis. Authors grant Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business explicit the right to include the published articles in databases, repositories and indexation services. License
License to Publish
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). The author hereby grants Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business an exclusive publishing and distribution license in the manuscript include tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript (the “Articleâ€) in print, electronic and all other media (whether now known or later developed), in any form, in all languages, throughout the world, for the full term of copyright, and the right to license others to do the same, effective when the article is accepted for publication. This license includes the right to enforce the rights granted hereunder against third parties.
Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale, and
- The right to self-archive the article.
Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business or its sublicensee.
Miscellaneous
Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business will publish the article (or have it published) in the Journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage that it deems appropriate.