Indonesian Islamic Commercial Banks’ Efficiency: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis
How to cite (SHIRKAH) :
Islamic banks in Indonesia are continuously experiencing a rapid growth; thus, it results in a competitive financial sector. Consequently, maintaining an excellent performance is a prerequisite to gain customers’ trust and loyalty, one of the ways is enhancing productivity and efficiency performance. Drawing on this issue, the present study aims to examine the efficiency of Islamic banks listed in the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in the period of 2015 to 2019. Employing Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) as a parametric approach, this study measured the efficiency level of cost and profit efficiency of the Indonesian Islamic commercial banks. The data were a cross-section and panel data obtained from financial reports established by seven Indonesian Islamic commercial banks. The result of frontier analysis on the efficiency costs showed that the value of sharia banks’ average efficiency in Indonesia was approximately 93.41%, while the efficiency of profit resulted in 55.35%. These results suggest that Islamic banks tend to be efficient in controlling costs from the year of 2015 to 2019. It is a worth saying that this study’s results contribute to providing fruitful insights for Islamic banks to increase their efficiency by controlling their cost of production such as the cost of funds and cost of operation.
Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
Aldeen, K. N., Herianingrum, S., & Al Agawany, Z. M. W. (2020). Islamic vs. Conventional Banks in Syria: Analysis of Financial Performances. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business, 5(1), 1–26.
Andor, M., & Parmeter, C. (2017). Pseudolikelihood estimation of the stochastic frontier model. In T. K. Bauer, W. Leininger, V. Clausen, R. Döhrn, M. Frondel, & J. Kluve (Eds.), Applied Economics 49(55). Ruhr-Universität Bochum (RUB), Department of Economics Universitätsstr. 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.4419/86788804
Andri, Suryanto, T., Ghofur, R. A., & Anggraeni, E. (2020). Analysis of Sharia Innovation Strategic and Efficiency towards Sustainable Ability Shariah Mandiri Banks in Lampung. JEBIS Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, 6(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.20473/jebis.v6i1.18712
Anwar, M. (2019). Cost efficiency performance of Indonesian banks over the recovery period: A stochastic frontier analysis. The Social Science Journal, 56(3), 377–389. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2018.08.002
Ascarya & Yumanita, D. (2006). Analisis efisiensi perbankan syariah di Indonesia dengan Data Envelopment Analysis. TAZKIA Islamic Finance and Business Review, 1(2), 1-32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Berger, A. N., & Hannan, T. H. (1998). The efficiency cost of market power in the banking industry: A test of the “quiet life†and related hypotheses. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(3), 454–465.
Chang, M., Jang, H. B., Li, Y. M., & Kim, D. (2017). The relationship between the efficiency, service quality and customer satisfaction for state-owned commercial Banks in China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(12), 2163. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122163
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.
Hadad, M. D., Hall, M. J., Kenjegalieva, K. A., Santoso, W., & Simper, R. (2011). Banking efficiency and stock market performance: an analysis of listed Indonesian banks. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 37(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-010-0192-1
Hardianto, D. S., & Wulandari, P. (2016). Islamic bank vs conventional bank: intermediation, fee based service activity and efficiency. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management., 9(2), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-01-2015-0003
Hendrawan, R., & Nasution, A. A. (2018). Assessing Banking Profit Efficiency Using Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Journal of Finance and Banking Review, 3(4), 67–76.
Hosen, M. N., & Rahmawati, R. (2016). Efficiency and Profitability in The Indonesian Islamic Banking Industry. 8(1), 33-48. Al-Iqtishad: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Syariah, 8(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v8i1.2507
Imam, P., & Kpodar, K. (2013). Islamic banking: how has it expanded? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 49(6), 112–137. https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X490607
Kallel, H., Hamad, S. B., & Triki, M. (2019). Modeling the efficiency of Tunisian and Moroccan banks using the SFA approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 68(5), 879–902. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2018-0099
Karray, S. C., & Jamel, eddine C. (2013). Bank size and efficiency in developing countries: intermediation approach versus value added approach and impact of non-traditional activities. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 3(5), 593.
Kumbhakar, S., Peresetsky, A., Shchetynin, Y., & Zaytsev, A. (2019). Technical efficiency and inefficiency: SFA misspecification. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1902.02824.
Kusmayadi, D., Badruzaman, J., & Firmansyah, I. (2017). Efficiency and profitability of Islamic banks in Indonesia. Advanced Science Letters, 23(9), 8807–8812. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.9975
Maulana, M. R., & Rusmita, S. A. (2019). Bank Fundamentals and Equity Financing in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(8), 197-216.
Mohamad, S., Hassan, T., & Bader, M. K. I. (2008). Efficiency of conventional versus Islamic Banks: international evidence using the Stochastic Frontier Approach (SFA). Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 4(2), 107–130.
Mokhtar, H. S. A., Abdullah, N., & Al-Habshi, S. M. (2006). Efficiency of Islamic Banking in Malaysia. Journal of Economic Cooperation 27, 2, 37–70. http://kantakji.com/media/7403/b300.pdf
Nguyen, P. H., & Pham, D. T. B. (2020). The cost efficiency of Vietnamese banks–the difference between DEA and SFA. Journal of Economics and Development, 22(2), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-12-2019-0075
Nugroho, L., Badawi, A., & Hidayah, N. (2019). Indonesia Islamic Bank Profitability 2010-2017. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business, 4(1), 75–97.
Rahmawati, R. (2015). Strategi peningkatan efisiensi biaya pada bank umum syariah berbasis stochastic frontier approach dan data envelopment analysis. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 17(4), 457–480. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v17i4.506
Saeed, M. B., & Saeed, S. K. (2018). Characteristics of Sharı ‘ah Supervisory Board, Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Efficiency of Islamic Banks: Evidence from Listed Banks in Asia. Journal of Islamic Business and Management, 8(1), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.26501/jibm/2018.0801-008
Sakouvogui, K., & Shaik, S. (2020). Impact of financial liquidity and solvency on cost efficiency: evidence from US banking system. Studies in Economics and Finance, 37(2), 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-04-2019-0155
Silva, T. C., Tabak, B. M., Cajueiro, D. O., & Dias, M. V. B. (2017). A comparison of DEA and SFA using micro-and macro-level perspectives: Efficiency of Chinese local banks. Physica: A Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 469, 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.11.041
Srairi, S. A. (2010). Cost and profit efficiency of conventional and Islamic banks in GCC countries. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-009-0161-7
Tahir, Z. M., & Haron, S. (2010). Cost and profit efficiency of Islamic banks: international evidence using the stochastic frontier approach. Banks and Bank Systems, 5(4), 78–83.
Wanke, P., Tsionas, M. G., Chen, Z., & Antunes, J. J. M. (2020). Dynamic network DEA and SFA models for accounting and financial indicators with an analysis of super-efficiency in stochastic frontiers: An efficiency comparison in OECD banking. International Review of Economics & Finance, 69, 456-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2020.06.002
Zuhroh, I., Ismail, M., & Maskie, G. (2015). Cost Efficiency of Islamic Banks in Indonesia–A Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21(1), 1122–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.150
Copyright
Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethical disputes, and fraud very seriously. Automotive Experiences is published under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (online and print) with the work simultaneously. We use the restrictive license (non-commercial) as follows:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4a02/e4a02c5cce3f7c090f0e5e6f04f3b566499f79d2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5296/c5296a2248a2ef3af4effa7c4571985177e9d644" alt=""
License
License to Publish
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). The author hereby grants Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business an exclusive publishing and distribution license in the manuscript include tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript (the “Articleâ€) in print, electronic and all other media (whether now known or later developed), in any form, in all languages, throughout the world, for the full term of copyright, and the right to license others to do the same, effective when the article is accepted for publication. This license includes the right to enforce the rights granted hereunder against third parties.
Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale, and
- The right to self-archive the article.
Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business or its sublicensee.
Miscellaneous
Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business will publish the article (or have it published) in the Journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage that it deems appropriate.