Abusive Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior among Sharia Bank Employees: The Moderating Role of Handarbeni
How to cite (SHIRKAH) :
The unresolved link between abusive leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB) can be clarified through handarbeni, an attitude of empathy and a sense of belonging to one's organization. This study  aims to explain the relationship between abusive leadership and employees' OCB while proposing an alternative model that conceptualizes handarbeni as a moderating variable to clarify this connection. The study involved 250 employees from Sharia Banks in Surakarta, Indonesia, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using both direct and online questionnaires through Google Forms. Multiple linear regression analysis was employed to examine the impact of independent variables on  dependent variables, while Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) was utilized  to assess the moderating effect using SPSS version 26 software. This study revealed a negative and significant correlation between abusive leadership and employees' OCB. Additionally, the study found that handarbeni  moderated the relationship between abusive leadership and employees' OCB. The findings indicate that employees with varying levels of a sense of belonging exhibited different behavioral patterns when subjected to abusive treatment from their superiors. The results suggest that leaders must minimize abusive behavior to enhance employees’ OCB. Furthermore, company leaders should  provide stimuli to foster a strong sense of handarbeni among their employees.
Abdelwahed, N. A. A., Al Doghan, M. A., Saraih, U. N., & Soomro, B. A. (2024). Unleashing potential: Islamic leadership’s influence on employee performance via Islamic organizational values, organizational culture and work motivation. International Journal of Law and Management. Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-01-2024-0019
Ahmad, R., Nawaz, M. R., Ishaq, M. I., Khan, M. M., & Ashraf, H. A. (2023). Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1015921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015921
Allen, K. A., Svendsen, G. T., Marwan, S., & Arslan, G. (2021). Trust and belonging in individual and organizational relationships. In Strategic corporate communication in the digital age (pp. 19-31). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80071-264-520211002
AlZgool, M., AlMaamari, Q., Mozammel, S., Ali, H., & Imroz, S. M. (2023). Abusive supervision and individual, organizational citizenship behaviour: exploring the mediating effect of employee well-being in the hospitality sector. Sustainability, 15(4), 2903. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042903
Ambrose, M. L., & Ganegoda, D. B. (2020). Abusive according to whom? Manager and subordinate perceptions of abusive supervision and supervisors' performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(8), 737-756. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2472
Arshad, M., Abid, G., & Torres, F. V. C. (2021). Impact of prosocial motivation on organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating role of ethical leadership and leader–member exchange. Quality & Quantity, 55(1), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-00997-5
Artina, B. S., Desnasari, D., Fitriyah, F., & Rizkita, R. G. (2020). The workforce in Indonesian organizations: An analysis based upon the cultural dimensions of Hofstede’s model. In Journal of International Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 56-64). https://doi.org/10.32535/jicp.v2i4.780
Aryee, S., Chen, Z. X., Sun, L. Y., & Debrah, Y. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model. Journal of applied psychology, 92(1), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191
Asim, M., Zhiying, L., Ghani, U., Nadeem, M. A., & Yi, X. (2024). Abusive supervision and helping behavior among nursing staff: a moderated mediation model. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 38(5), 724-740. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-12-2023-0372
Avey, J. B., Wu, K., & Holley, E. (2015). The influence of abusive supervision and job embeddedness on citizenship and deviance. Journal of Business Ethics, 129, 721-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2192-x
Bani-Melhem, S., Quratulain, S., & Al-Hawari, M. A. (2021). Does employee resilience exacerbate the effects of abusive supervision? A study of frontline employees’ self-esteem, turnover intention, and innovative behaviors. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 30(5), 611-629. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2021.1860850
Banwo, A. O., & Du, J. (2020). When the good outweighs the bad: Organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) in the workplace. Human Resource Development International, 23(1), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2018.1449546
Cahyono, E. (2021). Hubungan antara pemimpin abusif dan organizational citizenship behavior: Apakah agreeableness sebagai pemoderasi? JURNAL EKOMAKS: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 10(2), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.33319/jeko.v10i2.95
Cahyono, E., Haryono, T., Haryanto, B., & Harsono, M. (2020). The role of gender in the relationship between abusive supervision and employee’s organizational citizenship behaviour in Indonesia. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 13(3), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2020.108778
Cahyono, E., & Haryanto, B. (2023). How does the role of gender perspective and self-efficacy minimise the negative impacts of abusive leaders? An experimental design study. International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 7(3), 240-259. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWE.2023.135471
Chu, L. C. (2014). Mediating toxic emotions in the workplaceâ€the impact of abusive supervision. Journal of Nursing Management, 22(8), 953-963. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12071
Decoster, S., Camps, J., & Stouten, J. (2014). The mediating role of LMX between abusive supervision and work behaviors: A replication and extension. American Journal of Business, 29(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJB-06-2013-0038
Gregory, B. T., Osmonbekov, T., Gregory, S. T., Albritton, M. D., & Carr, J. C. (2013). Abusive supervision and citizenship behaviors: Exploring boundary conditions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(6), 628-644. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-10-2012-0314
Gümüştaş, C. & Karataş Gümüştaş, N. (2024). How and for whom abusive supervision influences organizational citizenship behavior: the roles of burnout and workplace friendship. International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-08-2023-0153
Kadir, A., Wirawan, H., Salam, R., Hattab, S., & Daswati, D. (2023). Abusive supervision in public service organisations: investigating the moderating effect of attribution styles. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 46(2), 184–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2023.2274571
Karim, K., Ilyas, G. B., Umar, Z. A., Tajibu, M. J., & Junaidi, J. (2023). Consumers’ awareness and loyalty in Indonesia banking sector: does emotional bonding effect matters? Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(10), 2668-2686. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-03-2022-0092
Kilroy, J., Dundon, T., & Townsend, K. (2023). Embedding reciprocity in human resource management: A social exchange theory of the role of frontline managers. Human Resource Management Journal, 33(2), 511-531. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12468
Kim, H., Chen, Y., & Kong, H. (2019). Abusive supervision and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating role of networking behavior. Sustainability, 12(1), 288. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010288
Kyei-Poku, I., & Yang, Y. (2020). Authentic leadership and citizenship behavior: A path through fairness and belongingness. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 23(3), 245-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-08-2018-0091
Lee, C. W., & Ande, T. (2023). Organizational behavior implication: HOFSTEDE'S perspectives in comparison Indonesia, Vietnam, China, Taiwan, and France. Advances in Management and Applied Economics, 13(4), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.47260/amae/1346
Liu, B., Ma, Y., Wang, H., Li, F., & Liu, G. (2024). Abusive supervision and organizational citizenship behavior: A meta-analysis based on the perspective of multiple theories. Current Psychology, 43(6), 5341-5354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04738-3
Maqbool, M., Lyu, B., Ullah, S., Khan, M. T., Abeden, A. Z. U., & Kukreti, M. (2024). Abusive supervisor triggers counterproductive work behaviors in nursing staff: role of psychological contract breach and Islamic work ethics. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 45(3), 461-477. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-06-2023-0295
Marchant-Pérez, P., Leitão, J., & Nunes, A. (2024). Abusive Leadership: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Innovations for Healthcare and Wellbeing: Digital Technologies, Ecosystems and Entrepreneurship, 423-455. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53614-4_21
Ndoja, K., & Malekar, S. (2020). Organisational citizenship behaviour: A review. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 11(2), 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWOE.2020.110629
Ogunfowora, B., Weinhardt, J. M., & Hwang, C. C. (2021). Abusive supervision differentiation and employee outcomes: The roles of envy, resentment, and insecure group attachment. Journal of Management, 47(3), 623-653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319862024
Oyewunmi, A. E., & Oyewunmi, O. A. (2022). Speaking silence: Abusive supervision, subordinates’ citizenship behavior, and whistleblowing intention. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079912
Qonitah, Q., & Sholahuddin, M. (2024). The Influence of Change Management, Organizational Culture and Transformational Leadership on the Performance of Indonesian Sharia Bank Employees. Brilliant International Journal of Management and Tourism, 4(1), 174-193. https://doi.org/10.55606/bijmt.v4i1.2771
Rafferty, A. E., & Restubog, S. L. D. (2011). The influence of abusive supervisors on followers' organizational citizenship behaviours: The hidden costs of abusive supervision. British Journal of Management, 22(2), 270-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00732.x
Raza, S. A., Khan, K. A., & Hakim, F. (2024). Whether organizational citizenship behavior is triggered by employee CSR perception and spiritual values: the moderating role of Islamic work ethics. Management Research Review, 47(3), 353-373. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-10-2022-0714
Rice, D. B., Taylor, R., & Forrester, J. K. (2020). The unwelcoming experience of abusive supervision and the impact of leader characteristics: Turning employees into poor organizational citizens and future quitters. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(4), 601-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1737521
Rohmadi, R., & Udin, U. (2024). Inequality of member participation threats to cooperative sustainability: A case study of PKPRI Wonosobo. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 571, p. 01009). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202457101009
Rosari, R. (2017). Hubungan kepemilikan psikologikal pada konteks budaya jawa dengan anteseden dan konsekuensinya. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 21(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.20885/jsb.vol21.iss1.art3
Samian, Riantoputra, C. D., & Budihardjo, A. (2021). Why employees endorse abusive leaders: the role of trust. Human Resource Development International, 24(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1810475
Santos, C., Coelho, A., & Marques, A. (2024). Greenwashing effects inside organizations: How does it affect organizational citizenship behaviours for the environment (OCBEs)? Social Responsibility Journal. Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2023-0303
Sodiq, A., Tri Ratnasari, R., & Mawardi, I. (2024). Analysis of the effect of Islamic Leadership and Job Satisfaction on sharia engagement and employee performance of Islamic Banks in Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2362772. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2362772
Song, G. R., & Kim, K. S. (2021). More similar, better belonging: effect of organizational citizenship behavior profile similarity on ostracism. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 57(4), 511-529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886320977322
Tepper, B. J., Simon, L., & Park, H. M. (2017). Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 123-152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062539
Wang, Y., Xiang, D., Yang, Z., & Ma, S. S. (2019). Unraveling customer sustainable consumption behaviors in sharing economy: A socio-economic approach based on social exchange theory. Journal of cleaner production, 208, 869-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.139
Wirawan, H., Samad, M. A., & Khairil, M. (2023). Investigating the effect of abusive supervision on work engagement through the role of employee creativity: the moderating effect of interpersonal communication competence. Human Resource Development International, 27(1), 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2023.2193809
Wonda, T. A. (2024). Examination of organizational citizenship behavior influence on employee performance attainment: an empirical investigation. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2418422. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2418422
Xu, E., Huang, X., Lam, C. K., & Miao, Q. (2012). Abusive supervision and work behaviors: The mediating role of LMX. Journal of Organizational behavior, 33(4), 531-543. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.768
Yu, L., & Duffy, M. K. (2021). The whiplash effect: The (moderating) role of attributed motives in emotional and behavioral reactions to abusive supervision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(5), 754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000810
Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Xu, S., Yang, L. Q., & Bednall, T. C. (2019). Why abusive supervision impacts employee OCB and CWB: A meta-analytic review of competing mediating mechanisms. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2474-2497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318823935
Zhao, H., Peng, Z., Han, Y., Sheard, G., & Hudson, A. (2013). Psychological mechanism linking abusive supervision and compulsory citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation study. The Journal of psychology, 147(2), 177-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2012.680522
Copyright
Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethical disputes, and fraud very seriously. Automotive Experiences is published under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (online and print) with the work simultaneously. We use the restrictive license (non-commercial) as follows:
BY (attribution): Users are allowed to share, distribute and redistribute the published article in any medium or format, with an identification of the authors and its initial publication in this journal. Authors are encouraged to post and distribute their articles immediately after publication (e.g., institutional or public repositories, personal websites). Authors are allowed to enter into additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published and an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
NC (non-commercial): Users are not allowed to use the article commercially without the permission of the authors. Authors agree explicitly that the published article is indexed worldwide in databases, repositories and indexation services, even if these services operate on a commercial basis. Authors grant Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business explicit the right to include the published articles in databases, repositories and indexation services. License
License to Publish
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). The author hereby grants Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business an exclusive publishing and distribution license in the manuscript include tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript (the “Articleâ€) in print, electronic and all other media (whether now known or later developed), in any form, in all languages, throughout the world, for the full term of copyright, and the right to license others to do the same, effective when the article is accepted for publication. This license includes the right to enforce the rights granted hereunder against third parties.
Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale, and
- The right to self-archive the article.
Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business or its sublicensee.
Miscellaneous
Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business will publish the article (or have it published) in the Journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage that it deems appropriate.