Institutional Quality and Sukuk Development: A Study of Five OIC Countries
How to cite (SHIRKAH) :
The objective of this study is to shed some light on the effect of institutional quality on the development of the global sukuk market. Specifically, this study examines the impacts of the institutional quality that adopts three dimensions of the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI), i.e., Rule of Law (RL), Regulatory Quality (RQ), and Government effectiveness (GE) on the global sukuk development of the top-five countries of sukuk issuance, i.e., Malaysia, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Indonesia, and Bahrain. Drawing on a quantitative study with the data in the forms of global sukuk issuance from 2002 to 2017, panel-data regression (OLS) and General Method of Moment (GMM) were applied. This study showed that RL and GE have a significantly positive effect on sukuk issuance; however, RQ did not influence the development of the global sukuk market. These results imply that a country that is capable to maintain the institutional quality, especially in terms of rule of law and government effectiveness, will most likely be the country that can successfully develop the sukuk market. These results play a crucial role in filling a research gap among previous studies and provide an empirical evidence of the government’s role and its influence on the sukuk development.
Abd.Aziz, H., Idriss, U., & Echchabi, A. (2016). Does sukuk financing promote economic growth an emphasis on the major issuing countries. Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics, 3(2), 63–63. https://doi.org/10.15238/tujise.2016.3.2.63-73
Adibuddin, A. F., Setiawan, D., & Sutopo, B. (2019). The recent development of islamic economic studies in indonesia. Shirkah Journal of Economics and Business, 4(1), 133–173. https://doi.org/10.22515/shirkah.v4i1.263
Ahmad, N., Daud, S. N. M., & Kefeli, Z. (2012). Economic Forces and the sukuk market. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65(ICIBSoS), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11
Alam, A., & Yazdifar, H. (2019). Institutional determinants of R & D investment : Evidence from emerging markets. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 138, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.007
Asian Development Bank. (2005). Improving the investment climate in Indonesia. In Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/29709/improving-investment-climate-ino.pdf on September 20, 2020.
BAPPENAS. (2016). Masterplan Arsitektur Keuangan Syariah Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.bappenas.go.id/files/-publikasi_utama/Masterplan Arsitektur Keuangan Syariah Indonesia.pdf on August 18
Borhan, N. A., & Ahmad, N. (2018). Identifying the determinants of Malaysian corporate Sukuk rating. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 11(3), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-02-2017-0045
Buchanan, B. G., Le, Q. V., & Rishi, M. (2012). Foreign direct investment and institutional quality: Some empirical evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 21(24), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2011.10.001
Challe, E., Ignacio, J., & Mengus, E. (2019). Journal of International Money and Finance Institutional quality and capital inflows : Theory and evidence q. Journal of International Money and Finance, 96, 168–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.05.005
Cherif, M., & Gazdar, K. (2010). Institutional and macroeconomic determinants of stock market development in mena region: new results from a panel data analysis. The International Journal of Banking and Finance, 7(1), 139–159.
Choi, J. J., Lee, S. M., & Shoham, A. (2016). The effects of institutional distance on FDI inflow: General environmental institutions (GEI) versus minority investor protection institutions (MIP). International Business Review, 25(1), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.11.010
Ekananda, M. (2016). Analisis ekonometrika data panel: teori lengkap dan pembahasan menyeluruh bagi penelitian ekonomi, bisnis, dan sosial (Edisi kedua). Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
Fagbemi, F., & Ajibike, J. O. (2018). Institutional quality and financial sector development : empirical evidence from Nigeria. American Journal of Business and Management, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.11634/216796061807919
Febrina, P., & Sumiyarni. (2014). Kelembagaan terhadap foreign direct investment di Asean 6. Media Ekonomi, 22, 241–260.
Gani, A. (2007). Governance and foreign direct investment links: Evidence from panel data estimations. Applied Economics Letters, 14(10), 753–756. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850600592598
Globerman, S., & Shapiro, D. (2002). Global foreign direct investment flows: The role of governance infrastructure. World Development, 30(11), 1899–1919. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00110-9
Hadiah, A. N. (2016). Financial services authority (OJK) policy on debt proportion and its impact on the profitability of DES listed companies in Indonesia. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business, 1(3), 327. https://doi.org/10.22515/shirkah.v1i3.29
Hassan, M. K., Aliyu, S., Paltrinieri, A., & Khan, A. (2019). A Review of Islamic investment literature. Economic Papers, 38(4), 345–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12230
Hassan, M. K., Paltrinieri, A., Dreassi, A., Miani, S., & Sclip, A. (2018). The determinants of co-movement dynamics between sukuk and conventional bonds. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 68, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2017.09.003
Huang, Y. (2010). Political Institutions and financial development : an empirical study. World Development, 38(12), 1667–1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.04.001
Intapan, C., & Sriboonchitta, S. (2019). Structural changes and their econometric modeling. in springer nature Switzerland AG 2019 (Vol. 808). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04263-9
International Islamic Financial Market. (2014). Sukuk Report: A Comprehansive Study of the Global Sukuk Market. (November), 136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
International Islamic Financial Market. (2018). IIFM Sukuk Report 2018 |7Th Edition. (April). Retrieved from www.LABUANIBFC.com on September 15, 2020.
Jain, P. K., Kuvvet, E., & Pagano, M. S. (2017). Corruption’s impact on foreign portfolio investment. International Business Review, 26(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.05.004
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2005). Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996-2004. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.718081
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance matters VII: Aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996-2007. Non-State Actors as Standard Setters, (June), 146–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635519.007
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2011). Governance matters vii: aggregate and individual governance indicators, 1996-2007. SSRN Electronic Journal, (June). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1148386
Keefer, S. K. and P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economic and Politics, 7(3), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.1995.tb00111.x
Khan, M. A., Khan, M. A., Abdulahi, M. E., Liaqat, I., & Shah, S. S. H. (2019). Institutional quality and financial development: The United States perspective. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 49, 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.-2019.01.001
Kusuma, K. A., & Silva, A. C. (2014). Sukuk Markets A Proposed Approach for Development. Policy Research Working Paper Series, (December), 41. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7133
Langbein, L., & Knack, S. (2012). The Worldwide Governance Indicators : Six , One , or None ? The Journal of Development Studies, 46, No 2(November 2012), 350–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/-00220380902952399
Law, S. H., & Azman-Saini, W. N. W. (2012). Institutional quality, governance, and financial development. Economics of Governance, 13(3), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-012-0112-z
Ojeka, S., Adegboye, A., Adegboye, K., Umukoro, O., Dahunsi, O., & Ozordi, E. (2019). Corruption perception, institutional quality and performance of listed companies in Nigeria. Heliyon, 5(10), e02569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02569
Paltrinieri, A., Dreassi, A., Migliavacca, M., & Piserà , S. (2020). Islamic finance development and banking ESG scores: Evidence from a cross-country analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 51, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101100
Phuc, N., Schinckus, C., Dinh, S., Phuc Canh, N., Schinckus, C., & Thanh, S. D. (2019). Do economic openness and institutional quality influence patents? Evidence from GMM systems estimates. International Economics, 157(October), 134–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2018.10.002
Robinson, J. (1952). The Model of an Expanding Economy. The Economic Journal, 62(245), 42–53. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2227172
Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0900900106
Roe, M. J., & Siegel, J. I. (2011). Political instability: Effects on financial development, roots in the severity of economic inequality. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(3), 279–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2011.02.001
Said, A., & Grassa, R. (2013). The determinants of sukuk market development: Does macroeconomic factors influence the construction of certain structure of sukuk? Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 3(5), 251–267. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2318233 on September 15, 2020.
Smaoui, H., & Ghouma, H. (2020). Sukuk market development and Islamic banks’ capital ratios. Research in International Business and Finance, 51(17). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101064
Smaoui, H., & Khawaja, M. (2017). The Determinants of sukuk market development. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(7), 1501–1518. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2016.1224175
Tran, H. T. (2018). Institutional quality and market selection in the transition to market economy. Journal of Business Venturing, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.07.001
Wang, Y., Cheng, L., Wang, H., & Li, L. (2014). Institutional quality, financial development and OFDI. Pacific Science Review, 16(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscr.2014.08.023
Widarjono, A. (2007). Ekonometrika Pengantar dan Aplikasinya (Edisi Kedua). Yogyakarta: Ekonisia.
Yustika, A. E. (2012). Ekonomi Kelembagaan: Paradigma, Teori, dan Kebijakan. Malang: Erlangga.
Copyright
Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethical disputes, and fraud very seriously. Automotive Experiences is published under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (online and print) with the work simultaneously. We use the restrictive license (non-commercial) as follows:
License
License to Publish
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). The author hereby grants Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business an exclusive publishing and distribution license in the manuscript include tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript (the “Articleâ€) in print, electronic and all other media (whether now known or later developed), in any form, in all languages, throughout the world, for the full term of copyright, and the right to license others to do the same, effective when the article is accepted for publication. This license includes the right to enforce the rights granted hereunder against third parties.
Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale, and
- The right to self-archive the article.
Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business or its sublicensee.
Miscellaneous
Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business will publish the article (or have it published) in the Journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage that it deems appropriate.