Responsibility and Accountability of University Social and Environmental Performances: A Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Model
How to cite (SHIRKAH) :
Since research on the use of sustainability balanced scorecard to assess university social and environmental performances still remains unexplored, this study aims to fill the gap by examining the acceptance of the idea of the State Islamic Religious Colleges (PTKIN) performances in terms of responsibility for social and environmental aspects based on the sustainability balanced scorecard model. Drawing on a qualitative research, eight respondents from the Board of National Accreditation for Higher Education (BAN-PT) and PTKIN policymakers were interviewed. The results indicated that PTKIN must pay more attention to social and environmental perspectives. It was further revealed that although BAN-PT regulation has explicitly included these two perspectives, there were several indicators that still need to be added according to the sustainability balanced scorecard model. Moreover, the results depicted several challenges such as budgeting, regulations, and paradigms that required some adjustment from the policymakers. These results contribute as fruitful insights for university policymakers in developing strategies to enhance university performances, particularly in social and environmental aspects.
Abdullah, M. (2019). UIN Raden Intan Lampung dan Gerakan Konservasi Lingkungan di PTKIN - Green Campus UIN Lampung. Accessed in August 2020 from https://green.radenintan.ac.id/uin-raden-intan-lampung-dan-gerakan-konservasi-lingkungan-di-ptkin/
Ahmad, K., Othman, K., Zabri, S. M., & Yaakub, A. A. (2018). Factors Associated with the SMEs Preferences Towards Islamic Banking Products and Services. Advanced Science Letters, 24(6), 4726–4730. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.11689
Al-Ashaab, A., Flores, M., Doultsinou, A., & Magyar, A. (2011). A balanced scorecard for measuring the impact of industry-university collaboration. Production Planning and Control, 22(6), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2010.536626
Alewine, H. C., & Stone, D. N. (2013). How does environmental accounting information influence attention and investment? International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 21(1), 22–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/18347641311299731
Andraeny, D., & Putri, D. D. (2017). Islamicity Financial Performance Index in Indonesian Islamic Banks. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business, 2(3), 317-253. https://doi.org/10.22515/shirkah.v2i3.170
Antariksa, W. F., & Setiawan, M. (2014). Pengaruh penerapan sistem manajemen mutu ISO 9001: 2008 di perguruan tinggi terhadap kinerja balanced scorecard (Studi Kasus pada Universitas Brawijaya). Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 12(3), 399-406.
Asy’ari, H. (2015). Perbandingan Sistem Manajemen Mutu ISO 9001:2008, Standard BANPT dan Total Quality Management di UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2015.41.141-157
Atiqah, A. (2019). Tanggung Jawab Sosial Universitas dan Tata Kelola Universitas Terhadap Citra UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Akuntabilitas, 12(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.15408/akt.v12i2.
Beschorner, T. (2013). Creating Shared Value: The One-Trick Pony Approach. Business Ethics Journal Review, 1(17), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.12747/bejr2013.01.17
Betianu, L., & Briciu, S. (2011). Balanced scorecard – sustainable development tool. Analele Ştiinţifice Ale Universităţii »Alexandru Ioan Cuza« Din Iaşi. Ştiinţe Economice, 58(Spec), 19–27.
Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Iowa: University of Iowa Press.
Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr030
Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69(2), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9071-z
Du, S., Yu, K., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2017). The Business Case for Sustainability Reporting: Evidence from Stock Market Reactions. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 36(2), 312–330.
Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21stâ€century business. Environmental quality management, 8(1), 37-51.
Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard - Linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.339
Global Reporting Initiatives. (2006). Global Reporting Initiative Global Reporting Initiative ( GRI ) Uptake.
Harjanto, N. (2019). Implementation Strategy of Higher Education Social Responsibility to Acquire New and Qualified In-Line Students : A Case Study. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 3(2), 162-173. https://doi.org/10.28992/ijsam.v3i2.93
Jassem, S., Zakaria, Z., & Azmi, A. C. (2021). Sustainability balanced scorecard architecture and environmental performance outcomes: a systematic review. Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2019-0582
Kalender, Z. T., & Vayvay, Ö. (2016). The Fifth Pillar of the Balanced Scorecard: Sustainability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235(October), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.11.027
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard—Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 83(7), 172
Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Best of breed: When it comes to gaining a market edge while supporting a social cause, “corporate social marketing†leads the pack. Social Marketing Quarterly, 11(4), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/15245000500414480
Lestari, A. S. (2013). Analisis Penilaian Kinerja Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi Dengan Metode Balanced Scorecard : Penerapannya Dalam Sistem Manajemen Strategis (Studi Kasus Pada Universitas Brawijaya Malang). 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Afforable Education, 52(April), 441–450.
Mahmudi, A. A., Surarso, B., & Subagio, A. (2014). Kombinasi Balanced Scorecard dan Objective Matrix Untuk Penilaian Kinerja Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis, 4(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21456/vol4iss1pp01-10
MarÃn, L., & de Maya, S. R. (2013). The role of affiliation, attractiveness and personal connection in consumer-company identification. European Journal of Marketing, 47(3), 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561311297526
McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2011). Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1480–1495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385696
Neely, A. D., Adams, C., & Kennerley, M. (2002). The performance prism: The scorecard for measuring and managing business success. London: Prentice Hall Financial Times.
Rabionet, S. E. (2011). How I Learned to Design and Conduct Semi-structured Interviews : An Ongoing and Continuous Journey. The Qualitative Report, 16(2), 563–566.
Sen, S., & Cowley, J. (2013). The Relevance of Stakeholder Theory and Social Capital Theory in the Context of CSR in SMEs: An Australian Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1598-6
Sidik, I., & Reskino, R. (2016). Zakat and Islamic Corporate Social Responsibility: Does It Take Effect to the Performance of Shari’a Banking?. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business, 1(2), 161-184. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.22515/shirkah.v1i2.23
Soegoto, E. S. (2011). Penerapan Manajemen Kinerja dengan Pendekatan Balanced Scorecard dalam Meningkatkan Akuntabilitas Pengelolaan Perguruan Tinggi. Majalah Ilmiah Unikom, 6(2), 131–142.
Sudaryo, Y. (2015). Kinerja Perguruan Tinggi dengan Pendekatan Strategic Map Balanced Scorecard. Sosiohumaniora, 17(1), 1–12.
Suhardiyah, M., & Nurdina. (2019). Implementation of environmental accounting in higher education solutions to improve the college’s role in the implementation of corporate social responsibility. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 245(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/245/1/012027
Symaco, L. P., & Tee, M. Y. (2019). Social responsibility and engagement in higher education: Case of the ASEAN. International Journal of Educational Development, 66(August), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.10.001
UI. (2020). UI GreenMetric Work University Rangkings 2020. In Universitas Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775398.2016.v2.i2.6719
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya. (2014). Standar Mutu Program Studi (berdasarkan indikator ban-pt). Accessed in August 2020 from https://ppm.um.surabaya.ac.id
Vaughn, P., & Turner, C. (2016). Decoding via Coding : Analyzing Qualitative Text Data Through Thematic Coding and Survey Methodologies Decoding via Coding : Analyzing Qualitative. Journal of Library Administration, 56(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2015.1105035
Wijaya, L. S., & Krismiyati, K. (2016). Penyusunan Model Program Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) di Perguruan Tinggi Kota Salatiga Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Intake Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 17(3), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v17i3.311
Yulianita, N. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) sebagai Aktivitas Social Marketing Public Relations. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 9(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.29313/-mediator.v9i1.1145
Zangoueinezhad, A., & Moshabaki, A. (2011). Measuring university performance using a knowledge-based balanced scorecard. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(8), 824–843. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401111182215
Copyright
Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethical disputes, and fraud very seriously. Automotive Experiences is published under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (online and print) with the work simultaneously. We use the restrictive license (non-commercial) as follows:
BY (attribution): Users are allowed to share, distribute and redistribute the published article in any medium or format, with an identification of the authors and its initial publication in this journal. Authors are encouraged to post and distribute their articles immediately after publication (e.g., institutional or public repositories, personal websites). Authors are allowed to enter into additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published and an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
NC (non-commercial): Users are not allowed to use the article commercially without the permission of the authors. Authors agree explicitly that the published article is indexed worldwide in databases, repositories and indexation services, even if these services operate on a commercial basis. Authors grant Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business explicit the right to include the published articles in databases, repositories and indexation services. License
License to Publish
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). The author hereby grants Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business an exclusive publishing and distribution license in the manuscript include tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript (the “Articleâ€) in print, electronic and all other media (whether now known or later developed), in any form, in all languages, throughout the world, for the full term of copyright, and the right to license others to do the same, effective when the article is accepted for publication. This license includes the right to enforce the rights granted hereunder against third parties.
Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale, and
- The right to self-archive the article.
Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business or its sublicensee.
Miscellaneous
Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business will publish the article (or have it published) in the Journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage that it deems appropriate.