Service Quality and Non-Muslim Satisfaction Using Sharia Bank Products and Services

Nova Ch Mamuaya* -  Faculty of Economics, State University of Manado, Indonesia
DOI : 10.22515/shirkah.v2i1.39

Some studies show that religious belief does not take effect affecting consumer using sharia bank products and services. This research has implemented six dimensions of Othman and Owen which modified five dimensions of Parasuraman with adding compliance dimension. The six dimensions of Othman & Owen are known as CARTER (compliance, assurance, reliability, tangible, empathy, and responsiveness). The research purpose is to analyze compliance, assurance, reliability, tangible, empathy, and responsiveness effect on non-Muslim customer satisfaction on sharia bank products and services at Manado Sulawesi Utara partially or simultaneously. The data was gathered with questionnaire instruments of 70 respondents, measured with five Likert scale five dots. The research result shows compliance, assurance, reliability, tangible, empathy, and responsiveness has significant effect on customer satisfaction. Responsive has most strong effect and compliance is the weakest.  

Keywords:  Sharia Bank, non-Muslim, quality service, customer satisfaction, Manado 

  1. Akbar, S., Shah, S.Z.A., Kalmadi, S. (2012). An Investigation of User Perceptions of Islamic Banking Practices in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, Vol. 5, No. 4, 353-370.
  2. Belaid, F., Boussaada, R., Belguith, H. (2017). Bank-Firm Relationship and Credit Risk: An Analysis on Tunisian Firms. Research in International Business and Finance 42, 532-543.
  3. Cronin, J.J.Jr & Steven A.T. (1994). SERVPERV Versus SERVQUAL: Reconciling Performance-Based and Percepcion-minus-Expectations Measurement of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, Vol.58, 125 – 131.
  4. Ferdinand, A. (2006). Metode Penelitian Manajemen, Pedoman Penelitian untuk Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis dan Disertasi Ilmu Manajemen. Edisi Dua. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  5. Hidayat, S.E., & Al-Bawardi, N.K. (2012). Non-Muslims’ Perceptions Toward Islamic Banking Services in Saudi Arabia. Journal of US Journal of US-China Public Administration, ISSN 1548-6591, Vol. 9, No. 6, 654-670.
  6. Imam Ghozali. (2005). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Edisi 3. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  7. Ismal, R. (2010). Strengthening and Improving the Liquidity Management in Islamic Banking. Humanomics 26 (1), 18-35.
  8. Kotler, P. (2005). Manajemen Pemasaran. Jakarta: Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.
  9. Lupiyoadi, R. (2001). Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa : Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  10. Malhotra, Naresh K. (2005). Riset Pemasaran Pendekatan Terapan. Edisi Keempat. Jilid 1. Jakarta: Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.
  11. Malhotra, Naresh K. (2005). Riset Pemasaran Pendekatan Terapan. Edisi Keempat. Jilid 2. Jakarta: Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.
  12. Manna, E. (2017). Customer-Oriented Employees: Blessing or Curse for Firms?. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 26 (4), 842-875.
  13. Nur Indriantoro & Bambang Supomo. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis untuk Akuntansi dan Manajeman. Edisi Pertama. Yogjakarta: BPFE-UGM.
  14. Othman, A., & Owen, L. (2001). Adopting and Measuring Customer Service Quality (Sq) In Islamic Banks: A Case Study In Kuwait Finance House. International Journal of Islamic Financial Services, 3(1), 1-26.
  15. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, W., & Berry, L. (1988). SERVQUAL: a Multiple Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64 (1), 2-40.
  16. Parasuraman, A., et al. (1994). Reassestmentof Expectation as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality. Journal of Marketing, Vol 58, 111-124.
  17. Qureshi, M. I., Khan, A., & Zaman, K. (2012). Structural Investigation of Service Quality in Conventional and Islamic Banking in Pakistan. International Review of Management and Marketing, 2(2), 99-105.
  18. Quttainah, M.A., Almutairi, A.R. (2017). Corporate Ethics: Evidence from Islamic Banks. Journal of Management and Govenance 21 (4). 815-840.
  19. Sekaran, Uma (2006). Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis. Penerjemah: Kwan Men Yon. Edisi 4. Buku 2. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  20. Singarimbun, M & Sofian E. (2006). Metode Penelitian Survey. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  21. Singgih Santoso. (2002). SPSS Statistik Multivariate. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
  22. Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Bisnis (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
  23. Teas, R. Kenneth. (1994). Expectations as a Comparison Standart in Measuring Service Quality : An Assestment of a Reassestment. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, 132-139.
  24. Tjiptono, F. (2012). Service Management, Mewujudkan Layanan Prima. Yogjakarta: Andi.
  25. Yuliansyah. (2016). The Leverage of Financing Performance Through Knowledge Sharing Using a System of Interactive Measurement of Performance. International Business Management 10 (3), 200-208.

Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business
Published by Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business (FEBI)
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Surakarta, Indonesia
Jln. Pandawa No. 1, Pucangan, Kartasura, Central Java, Indonesia, 57168
Phone: +62271-781516
Website: http://shirkah.or.id/new-ojs/index.php/home
Email: shirkahiainsurakarta@gmail.com

P-ISSN :2503-4235 | E-ISSN : 2503-4243

This ejournal system and it's contents licensed under
a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License