Proposing Blue Sukuk in Indonesia: An Interpretive Structural Model

Aam Slamet Rusydiana* -  Sharia Economic Applied Research and Training (SMART), Indonesia
Mohammad Iqbal Irfany -  Faculty of Economics and Management, IPB University, Indonesia
DOI : 10.22515/shirkah.v6i1.333

This research aims to identify the priority factors that being barriers to issue and develop Islamic blue sukuk in Indonesia. Employing the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) method, it also offers several solutions for the identified problems. As an advanced planning methodology, ISM is used to identify, analyze, and summarize various relationships among factors that define a problem, model, or issue. In the ISM framework, there are three criteria of blue sukuk development in Indonesia including (1) aspect or foundation required within the framework of developing blue sukuk; (2) infrastructure that will be used as a basis for sukuk issuance (underlying projects); and (3) stakeholders involved in the development of blue sukuk in Indonesia. Results show that important foundations needed in the development of blue sukuk are regulatory aspects, feasible underlying projects, investors, and inter-institutional coordination, respectively. Finally, possible underlying infrastructures for the issuance of Blue Sukuk are the development of integrated fishing villages as well as the procurement of large and environmentally friendly fishing boats.

Keywords : Blue Sukuk; Interpretive Structural Model; Sovereign Sukuk

  1. Altaleb, G.S., & Alkhatib, A.Y. (2016). Sovereign Islamic sukuk and the economic development: A case study of Jordan. European Journal of Business and Management, 8(32), 115-118.
  2. Abdullah, N., & Nayan, M.A. (2020). Green Sukuk: Financing the Future to Sustainable Environment. International Journal of Zakat and Islamic Philanthropy, 2(2), 14-23.
  3. Anggraini, Y. (2018). Peran green sukuk dalam memperkokoh posisi Indonesia di pasar keuangan syariah global. El-Barka: Journal of Islamic Economics and Business, 1(2), 251–268.
  4. Arshad, H., Muda, R., & Osman, I. (2018). Impact of exchange rate and oil price on the yield of sovereign bond and sukuk: Evidence from Malaysian capital market. Journal of Emerging Economies & Islamic Research, 5(4), 27-41.
  5. Ascarya, W. G., Widodo C., Enny A., & Ferry S. (2012). Strategi Meningkatkan Preferensi Perbankan Syariah Indonesia Dalam Menggunakan Pembiayaan Bagi- Hasil. Jakarta: Central Banking Education and Studies Department, Bank Indonesia.
  6. Bolaños, R., Fontela, E., Nenclares, A., & Pastor, P. (2005). Using interpretive structural modelling in strategic decision‐making groups. Management Decision, 43(6), 877-895.
  7. Devi, A. & Rusydiana, A. S. (2016). Islamic Group Lending Model (GLM) and Financial Inclusion. International Journal of Islamic Business Ethics, 1(1), 80-94.
  8. Faisal, M.N., & Al-Esmael, B.A. (2014). Modeling the enablers of organizational commitment. Business Process Management Journal, 20(1), 25-46.
  9. Faisal, M.N. (2015). A study of inhibitors to transparency in red meat supply chains in Gulf cooperation council (GCC) countries. Business Process Management Journal, 21(6), 1299-1318.
  10. Godet, M. (1986). Introduction to ‘la prospective’: seven key ideas and one scenario method. Futures, 18(2), 134-157.
  11. Gorvett, R., & Liu, N. (2007). Using interpretive structural modeling to identify and quantify interactive risks. Orlando –USA: ASTIN Colloquium.
  12. Handayani, D., & Surachman, E.N. (2017). Sukuk negara as financing strategy for renewable energy infrastructure: Case study of Muara Laboh geothermal power project. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(4), 115-125.
  13. Hariyanto, E. (2019). Blue Sukuk in Indonesia. Results of personal indepth-interviews, August 10th, 2019, Tazkia University.
  14. Ilma, A. F. N. (2017). Blue Economy: Kesimbangan Perspektif Ekonomi dan Lingkungan. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 14(1).
  15. Ismatullah, R. (2011). Paradigma ekonomi kelautan dalam perspektif ekonomi Islam: Reinterpretasi Ayat-ayat Kelautan yang Berdimensi Ekonomi. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Indonesia, 1(2), 95-110.
  16. Jabeen, F. & Faisal, M.N. (2018). Imperatives for improving entrepreneurial behavior among females in the UAE: An empirical study and structural model. Gender in Management, 33(3), 234-252. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-03-2016-0042
  17. Jabeen, F., Faisal, M.N., & Katsioloudes, M.I. (2017). Entrepreneurial mindset and the role of universities as strategic drivers of entrepreneurship evidence from the UAE. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 24(1), 136-157.
  18. Jarkasih, M., & Rusydiana, A.S. (2010). Mengurai masalah pengembangan sukuk korporasi Indonesia dengan pendekatan ANP. Proceedings at International Academic Conference, Shariah Economic Days 2010 FEUI, 3 February 2010.
  19. Jarkasih, M., & Rusydiana, A.S. (2009). Perkembangan pasar sukuk: Perbandingan Indonesia, Malaysia dan dunia. Antisipasi: Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi, 1(2).
  20. Kadir, H., Rizal, A., & Laapo, A. (2016). Analisis Tingkat Keberlanjutan Program Kapal Inka Mina (30 gt) di Desa Labuan Bajo Kabupaten Donggala. Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi Tadulako, 5(3), 54–64.
  21. Kanungo S & V.V. Batnagar, (2002). Beyond Generic Models for Information System Quality: The Use of Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM). Journal of System Research and Behavior Science. 19(2), 531-549.
  22. Kazemi, M. (2015). Compiling the strategy plan using a hybrid of BSC-ISM. Management Science Letters, 5(2015), 11-20.
  23. Khairunisa, R., Akbar, N., & Devi, A. (2017). Exploring strategies to enhance Islamic banking’s role to raise cash waqf funds. Iqtishadia: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, 10(2), 1-28.
  24. Lee, D. M. (2007). Structured Decision Making with Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM). Canada: Sorach Inc.
  25. Li, M., and Yang, J. (2014). Analysis of interrelationships between critical waste factors in office building retrofit projects using interpretive structural modeling. International Journal of Construction Management, 14(1), 15-27.
  26. Marimin. (2004). Pengambilan Keputusan Kreteria Majemuk. Teknik dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
  27. Mazdeh, M.M., Shafia, M.A., Bandarian, R., & Kahrizi, A. (2015). An ISM approach for analyzing the factors in technology transfer. Decision Science Letters, 4(2015), 335-348.
  28. Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries. (2019). Permen KP Nomor 63 Tahun 2017 tentang : Rencana Strategis Kementerian kelautan Tahun 2015 - 2019.
  29. Mitsaliyandito, R.Q., & Arundina, T. (2018). Dynamic relationship between sovereign bond and sukuk market developments in Indonesia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 26(5), 27-38.
  30. Moody’s Investors Service. (2019). Moody’s Annual Report. New York.
  31. Morea, D., & Poggi, L.A. (2017). An innovative model for the sustainability of investments in the wind energy sector: The use of green sukuk in an Italian case study. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(2), 53-60.
  32. Nienhaus, V., & Karatas, A. (2016). Market perceptions of liquid sovereign sukuk: A new asset class? International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 9(1), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-03-2015-0027
  33. Rahman, M.P., Duasa, J., Kassim, S., & Zainudin, W.R.A. (2017). Sovereign sukuk pricing analysis: Do macroeconomic variables matter? International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 25(3), 513-528.
  34. Rani, F., & Cahayasari, W. (2015). Model Blue Economy di Kawasan Asia Pasifik (Studi Kasus: Penerapan Model Blue Economy pada Industri Perikanan Indonesia). Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Riau, 2(1).
  35. Ravi, V. (2015). Analysis of interactions among barriers of eco-efficiency in electronics packaging industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(1), 16-25.
  36. Rusydiana, A.S., & Devi, A. (2018). Mengembangkan koperasi syariah di Indonesia: Pendekatan interpretive structural model (ISM). Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 9(1), 1-23.
  37. Rusydiana, A.S. (2018a). Developing Islamic financial technology in Indonesia. Hasanuddin Economics and Business Review, 2(2), 143-152.
  38. Rusydiana, A.S. (2018b). Analysis of cash waqf development in Indonesia using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 4(1), 1-24.
  39. Saaty, T. L. (2004). Decision making—the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of systems science and systems engineering, 13(1), 1-35.
  40. Sage, A. (1977). Interpretive Structural Modeling: Methodology for Large-Scale Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
  41. Sharma, V., Grover, S., & Sharma, S.K. (2017). Analyzing the barriers affecting the effective utilization of quality tools and techniques using integrated ISM approach. Management Science Letters, 7(2017), 525-540.
  42. Thakkar, J., Deshmukh, S. G., Gupta, A. D., & Shankar, R. (2007). Development of a balanced scorecard: an integrated approach of interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and analytic network process (ANP). International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(1), 25-59.
  43. Venkatesh, V.G., Rathi, S., & Patwa, S. (2015). Analysis on supply chain risks in Indian apparel retail chains and proposal of risk prioritization model using interpretive structural modeling. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 26, 153-167.
  44. Warfield, J. N. (1974). Developing interconnected matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics, 4(1), 81-87.

Shirkah: Journal of Economics and Business
Published by Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business (FEBI)
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Surakarta, Indonesia
Jln. Pandawa No. 1, Pucangan, Kartasura, Central Java, Indonesia, 57168
Phone: +62271-781516
Website: http://shirkah.or.id/new-ojs/index.php/home
Email: shirkahiainsurakarta@gmail.com

P-ISSN :2503-4235 | E-ISSN : 2503-4243

This ejournal system and it's contents licensed under
a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License